ANSI/ISEA 105 Cut Levels A1-A9
A short guide that explains how cut scores should be compared with task severity, edge type and worker dexterity needs.
Open standards note
The brand position behind this site is technical, measured and documentation-led. It treats every helmet, eyewear and glove recommendation as a workplace decision that must survive EHS review, procurement comparison, distributor communication and worker feedback.
Our role is not to promise a perfect outcome. It is to help buyers connect a known hazard to the right standard language, the right product family and the right implementation notes before PPE reaches the floor.
HexArmor technical program principle
That principle shapes the way this site is written. Head protection content distinguishes helmet type, electrical class and accessory assumptions. Eye and face protection content separates impact, coating, tint and splash context. Hand and arm protection content explains cut level, puncture exposure, grip and impact requirements without overclaiming a single glove for every task.
A short guide that explains how cut scores should be compared with task severity, edge type and worker dexterity needs.
Open standards noteA practical reading of abrasion, blade cut, tear, puncture and ISO cut letters for buyers comparing glove families.
Open standards noteReview language for Type I and Type II helmets, Class E, G and C use cases, and accessory compatibility assumptions.
Open standards noteImpact marking, lens tint, anti-fog coating and face shield pairing notes for indoor-outdoor industrial teams.
Open standards noteThe materials are written to support decision quality, not to replace the employer's hazard assessment or the product manufacturer's formal instructions. A responsible PPE program still requires site-specific review, worker training and replacement discipline.
Share the decision context and the documents you already have. HexArmor can help organize the technical story before a trial or bid package moves forward.